Uncategorized
Vote yes to Leeds mayor–letter in Yorkshire Evening Post
0On Thursday the people of Leeds have a once in a lifetime opportunity to vote for something that will make a fundamental improvement to the way our great city is run. Voting yes to a mayor who is elected by everyone in the city will transform the way we are run and enable Leeds to continue to be one of Europe’s great cities.
The case for voting yes is that a mayor voted for by us all will be far more democratic and accountable than a system where as few as 25 councillors get together in secret and decide who will run Leeds. A mayor will have a mandate that is hundreds of thousands of voters and will be such a powerful voice for Leeds that politicians in London and Brussels will be forced to listen.
The political establishment in Leeds want you to vote no and have been vigorously campaigning to preserve their status quo by falsely claiming that a mayor would cost more, when in fact it could potentially save money. When Leicester elected a mayor it saved £250,000 on the cost of a chief executive’s salary! They claim a mayor would be unaccountable, when the truth is they would be accountable to you the voter and would be scrutinised by elected councillors. Under the current system a leader is only accountable to a small number of councillors in his own party.
Voting yes for elected mayor for Leeds would: boost regeneration and economic growth; revitalise local communities; be a powerful ambassador for Leeds; attract inward investment into transport and housing; articulate a clear vision for the future of the city. Above all put the people in charge of politicians, instead of the politicians thinking they are in charge of you.
Beware of spin about elected mayors
1You only need to listen to the spin, distortion and rhetoric of those opposed to a directly elected mayor to understand why having one is so important to the future of Leeds. The city isn’t safe in their hands.
There are lots of arguments in favour of having a directly elected mayor, but none as compelling as the simple fact that it is far more democratic than the closed shop that we have at the moment. But that’s not what the no campaign spin would mislead you to believe.
First spin – it’s “undemocratic”
Currently the leader of Leeds City Council is selected in a secret meeting by a handful of councillors. A meeting that is so closed and secret that not only are their own political party members not allowed to vote, they aren’t even allowed in the room or even to know exactly what happened! This is true of Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats.
The no campaigners would have you believe that is democratic.
The reality is they want to preserve their secretive cliques, where deals are done behind closed doors. If you work hard, keep your nose clean and kow tow to those who’ve served their time then you to can become a member. That’s just one reason why some of the political elite in Leeds want to preserve their cosy status quo. That’s what is really undemocratic.
The alternative is that every voter, that’s you and me, can vote openly to decide who’ll be the mayor. That’s democratic.
The spin from the no campaign is that you will be asked a “trick question” in a “devious and cynical way”. I’m dismayed that they could hold the good people of Leeds in such contempt that they don’t believe they can answer a fair and simple question because they judge it’s too long!
Judge for yourself if you think it’s fair and easy to understand:
How would you like Leeds City Council to be run?
By a leader who is an elected councillor chosen by a vote of the other elected councillors. This is how the council is run now.
OR
By a mayor who is elected by voters. This would be a change from how the council is run now.
But the no campaigners believe you are too stupid to judge that question on its own merits without their ‘help’!
In Leeds we suffered seven years of no clear vision for the city where the Tories and Liberal Democrats passed the leadership between them like pass the parcel at a children’s party. During this time the leader of Leeds, the second biggest council in England, was selected by as few as 22 councillors!
Imagine – the leader of a city with a population of almost 800,000 – the 24th most populous city in the European Union – was chosen by less than 25 people! And the no campaigners would have you believe that’s democracy.
The political elite and no campaigners are so afraid of the truth that they even tried to stop an impartial, factual leaflet being sent out to every voter in the city. The leaflet simply explained what the referendum was about and didn’t make a case either for or against. But so afraid are they of change that they wanted to stifle knowledge and facts about the election.
Whatever the arguments for and against an elected mayor It’s simply perverse and arrogant to claim that votes by a handful of people are more democratic than votes by hundreds of thousands of people.
Spin two – it’s “expensive”
That’s quite a claim as they don’t actually know what it would cost. As I’m a supporter of yes to directly elected mayors I could equally spin like the no campaign and claim it’s cheaper. But I won’t, because unlike the no campaign I don’t believe lying is a legitimate tactic in politics.
The no campaign would have you believe that an elected mayor would cost Leeds one million pounds over four years. It’s an absolute lie based on prejudice, supposition and innuendo.
The simple fact is that their no hard evidence that it will cost either more or less. In all likelihood it will probably cost about the same as the current system. But I’m honest enough to say that’s just my personal opinion. Unlike the no campaign I won’t lie and claim it’s a fact.
It’s also focusing on the wrong thing. The cost of democracy to Leeds City Council is a tiny, tiny percentage of its overall budget.
What you should really care about is the potential for a directly elected mayor to actually save money by spending the council’s budget more effectively. This isn’t just my claim, but the evidence is in an authoritative, independent report from the Warwick commission where experts studied what has happened in cites with mayors around the UK and the world. The report concluded that potentially billions of pounds could be saved. Fact, not fiction.
Spin three – “Doncaster”
In Yorkshire Doncaster is the bogeyman. Shout it out and scare the children. But Doncaster, isn’t Leeds. It just shows what a small minded and parochial vision some people in Leeds have that they want to compare one of Europe’s leading cities with a town down the down the road.
Doncaster has a long history of being a dysfunctional council that long pre-dated it having a mayor including councillors convicted of fraud and jailed. An elected mayor isn’t a magical panacea to cure all ills. Doncaster’s local political community was ill long before its recent history of mayors.
By contrast Leeds has a good council and some excellent councillors. Modernisation and an elected mayor is far more likely to strengthen the city and enable it to compete more effectively in the global market for jobs and investment.
But instead of passing judgement from 30 miles up the road in Leeds and arrogantly pretending to be experts why not look at what the people on the ground in Doncaster think? A BBC poll shows that 59% of Doncaster voters think an elected mayor is a good thing. Not quite what the no campaign is telling you. And those who really should know are Doncaster’s local MPs – and both Ed Milliband and Caroline Flint are in favour of elected mayors.
Spin four – “an elected mayor takes almost all the power”
Once again not true. The no campaigners point out that the leader of the council is currently constantly scrutinised by councillors. What they don’t say is that a mayor could also be scrutinised in the same way.
They also claim that the mayor would take almost all the powers of the council. In fact a mayor would appoint an executive of elected councillors to support her or him, exactly the same as a leader does now. The main difference is that the mayor’s mandate would come from all the voters of Leeds. The leader’s mandate just comes from the very same councillors he appoints to well-paid jobs on the executive.
A mayor is accountable to every single voter in Leeds, unlike a leader who is only accountable to the councillors in his own party and to voters in one out of the 33 wards in Leeds.
Vote yes for a democratic Leeds mayor
While the three political party leaders in Leeds are opposed to an elected mayor the indications are that the people of Leeds are more forward thinking. A recent BBC poll showed that while most people didn’t know much about the idea of elected mayors, the common sense response of most to the balanced question was for 57% to say yes and just 34% to say no.
I have faith and believe in the people of Leeds to see through the spin and make the right choice and not the choice of the self-selected political elite who want to preserve the system for themselves.
#yes2leedsmayor #yes2mayors
Conference performances and shadow cabinet reshuffle
The newspapers and political blogs are already full of rumours and recommendations about a possible shadow cabinet reshuffle now that Ed Miliband has a free hand and isn’t bound by the ridiculous shadow cabinet elections. This is my contribution to the speculation, red stays in, blue is out as they doing more to help the Tories than us:
Leader of the Labour Party | Ed Miliband
Yes, I’d keep him, even though it was a truly dire speech.
Deputy Leader and Shadow Secretary of State for International Development | Harriet Harman
We need Harriet because she’s the only one with experience of being in the shadow cabinet before 1997, but she’s never one that impressed me – last on my list for the deputy leadership elections.
Shadow Chancellor | Ed Balls
Love him, or loath him you can’t deny that Ed is doing a cracking job, let’s leave him be.
Shadow Foreign Secretary | Douglas Alexander
He used to be one of Labour’s rising stars. Dumping him, would open up one of the four senior posts for someone who actually has talent.
Shadow Chief Whip | Rosie Winterton
Doing a good job, so let’s keep her in post.
Shadow Home Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities | Yvette Cooper MP
She’s already in one of the four most senior posts, so the only place she could go is to replace Ed (M that is, not the hubby). Ed had better up his game, because she has.
Shadow Chief Secretary | Angela Eagle
So she’s doing one of the four most important jobs. You’d never know. Bye Angela.
Shadow Secretary of State for Business, Innovation & Skills | John Denham
Sorry John, this is a vital post as growing the economy is what will get us out of the mess, but I’m not hearing anything worthwhile from you.
Cabinet Office and Minister for the Olympics | Tessa Jowell
Sorry Tessa, heard you at the Progress rally and you used all the right words about a need for a new politics and trust. Problem is it didn’t sound like you actually understood them, it’s no good just trotting out buzz words.
Shadow Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government | Caroline Flint
Why is the speculation targeting Caroline? She’s doing a great job and is Labour’s best hope for helping us to come up with and sell some radical new ideas for local government – because we certainly need to dramatically shake up the status quo, but not always in the ways that the Tories want to.
Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media & Sport | Ivan Lewis
Hard one this. I like Ivan and think he’s doing a reasonable job, but his conference speech was dire and his idea for licensing journalists just bonkers. Sorry Ivan, you’re the only one I’d be sad to get rid of, but we need the space.
Shadow Leader of the House of Commons | Hilary Benn
Come on Ed, give the man a chance. He’s ace on radio interviews, so why don’t you deploy him more?
Shadow Secretary of State for Defence | Jim Murphy
Fairly neutral on Jim, but there are enough others that need to go so there is space for Jim to stay.
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs | Mary Creagh
Got off to a very slow start and could have been better on the whole forest sale issue, but has now well and truly got into her stride and is doing a great job,
Shadow Secretary of State for Education and Election Coordinator | Andy Burnham
Good performance all year and absolutely brilliant conference speech. Only possible reason for not promoting Andy is that he is so good at education which is vitally important. But there are others that could do that job, let’s get Andy into Shadow Foreign Secretary to give Hague a run for his money, which Douglas is failing spectacularly to do.
Disclaimer – not just saying that as Andy’s a friend, believe me it’s true!
Shadow Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice | Sadiq Khan
Another one I’m neutral about, so Sadiq can stay.
Shadow Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change | Meg Hillier
Meg, Meg this is important. The coalition is terrible. Shame your response is. Bye.
Shadow Secretary of State for Health | John Healey
This is a hard one. I’m usually impressed by John, but he’s been pretty weak so far on health. Let’s keep him in, but moved to something less important.
Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland | Shaun Woodward
Neutral again so Shaun can stay as he’s been good in the past and perhaps can be again.
Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland | Ann McKechin
Ann who? Bye.
Shadow Secretary of State for Transport | Maria Eagle
Transport is important and Maria’s not making the grade. Bye.
Shadow Secretary of State for Wales | Peter Hain
Peter impressed me in the deputy leadership elections so he can stay.
Shadow Secretary of State for Work & Pensions | Liam Byrne
Doing a good job, but let’s move him as I think that a new entrant would be good in this post.
Space for new blood
I’ve managed to find space for eight new faces, so these are some of my suggestions:
Rachel Reeves – great job as a junior DWP shadow, so let’s put her in the big seat and give Liam something else.
Chuka Umunna – heard him give a great speach at the FSB fringe. Since I want to get rid of John Denham, let’s give Chuka a promotion in the same shadow department he’s already in.
John Woodcock – a rising star that isn’t talked about enough. Let’s get him out of the junior shadow transport job and into the hot seat to replace Maria.
Gerry Sutcliffe – we don’t want too many very new faces and Gerry is a seasoned performer who’ll bring some gravitas to the shadow front bench, but will also seem new as he’s relatively unknown.
Michael Dugher – could make a good attack dog and we need one.
Gloria De Piero – hasn’t shone yet like all of the others I name, but has potential.
Don’t know enough about the rest of the possibilities, so can’t make any more suggestions.
New Leeds constituency predictions by 2010 local election results
I’ve now got the data to do the new Leeds constituency predictions by votes in the 2010 local elections, which in Leeds happened at the same time as the general election. It’s also a flawed method as it doesn’t take into account factors such as people voting different ways in local and national elections, and it also doesn’t take into account where the available parties are different in the local and national elections. This is most notable in Morley where the Morley Borough Independents won both Morley wards in the local election, but didn’t stand in the general election.
Guardian predictions on percentage of general election vote
| Cons | Green | Labour | Lib Dem | WIN | Majority | |
| Guisley & Yeadon | 18,633 | 386 | 15,901 | 14,809 | CON | 2,732 |
| Leeds North | 12,637 | 675 | 16,630 | 15,923 | LAB | 707 |
| Leeds North East | 15,830 | 0 | 21,817 | 8,517 | LAB | 5,987 |
| Leeds North West & Nidderdale | 18,829 | 123 | 18,543 | 14,691 | CON | 286 |
| Leeds South & Outwood | 12,828 | 0 | 18,374 | 7,996 | LAB | 5,546 |
| Leeds South East | 18,145 | 0 | 19,865 | 8,985 | LAB | 1,720 |
| Leeds South West & Morley | 14,142 | 588 | 19,656 | 8,985 | LAB | 5,514 |
| Leeds West & Pudsey | 15,078 | 909 | 18,990 | 12,059 | LAB | 3,912 |
Predictions based on 2010 local election results by ward
| Cons | Others | Labour | Lib Dem | WIN | Majority | |
| Guisley & Yeadon | 17,402 | 3,486 | 11,464 | 21,868 | LIB DEM | 4,466 |
| Leeds North | 8,950 | 3,951 | 17,312 | 15,062 | LAB | 2,250 |
| Leeds North East | 18,072 | 4,214 | 19,252 | 9,611 | LAB | 1,180 |
| Leeds North West & Nidderdale | 24,593 | 3,120 | 14,508 | 15,062 | CON | 9,229 |
| Leeds South & Outwood | 11,560 | 6,720 | 18,881 | 7,220 | LAB | 7,321 |
| Leeds South East | 12,427 | 5,907 | 21,984 | 11,379 | LAB | 9,557 |
| Leeds South West & Morley | 9,674 | 16.484 | 17,529 | 6,693 | LAB | 7,855 |
| Leeds West & Pudsey | 12,666 | 6,069 | 19,220 | 11,336 | LAB | 6,554 |
As you can see both sets of predictions are significantly different in the size of majorities they predict. And if we looked at the 2011 local election results we’d see yet another set of results.
That said, it still leaves Labour with six of the eight seats, the main difference being in the size of the predicted majorities in the other two – and that the Liberal Democrats manage to win Guisley and Rawdon, which is doubtful.
Leeds constituency boundary changes–more analysis
The Guardian data site has helpfully provided some data that enable you to make more ‘assumptions’ about the boundary changes.
Predictions based on the 2010 general election (i.e. I can’t see where it says how it has calculated them, but it looks like via crude percentages from each old seat rather than votes per ward in local elections). Once I have the data based on votes per ward I’ll try and post an update.
| Cons | Green | Labour | Lib Dem | WIN | Majority | |
| Guisley & Yeadon | 18,633 | 386 | 15,901 | 14,809 | CON | 2,732 |
| Leeds North | 12,637 | 675 | 16,630 | 15,923 | LAB | 707 |
| Leeds North East | 15,830 | 0 | 21,817 | 8,517 | LAB | 5,987 |
| Leeds North West & Nidderdale | 18,829 | 123 | 18,543 | 14,691 | CON | 286 |
| Leeds South & Outwood | 12,828 | 0 | 18,374 | 7,996 | LAB | 5,546 |
| Leeds South East | 18,145 | 0 | 19,865 | 8,985 | LAB | 1,720 |
| Leeds South West & Morley | 14,142 | 588 | 19,656 | 8,985 | LAB | 5,514 |
| Leeds West & Pudsey | 15,078 | 909 | 18,990 | 12,059 | LAB | 3,912 |
What’s interesting about this is that none of the majorities are huge and it show the Liberal Democrats have a significant vote in both of the Conservative seats. It only takes a small amount of those Liberal Democrat voters to switch to Labour (many switched from Labour in the first place) for these seats to be winnable for Labour.
The other interesting data is the one that shows what percentage of the old constituencies goes into the new ones.
Guisley & Yeadon
Theoretically a Tory seat so the lead contender is likely to be Stuart Andrew, the existing Conservative MP for Pudsey. Given the size of the Liberal Democrat vote and the current state of affairs it’s also a seat where a hard-working Labour candidate actually has a chance.
Leeds North
Theoretically a Labour seat, but the largest component is Leeds North West which at the moment has the Liberal Democrat Greg Mulholland. Then there is approximately 20% each from Leeds West, Leeds Central and Leeds North East. Given that Hilary Benn (Leeds Central) and Rachel Reeves (Leeds West) both have alternatives – and that the new constituency that takes most of the old Leeds North East electorate is likely to be Conservative – this looks like one for Fabian Hamilton.
Leeds North East
Theoretically a Labour seat with a healthy Labour majority. It’s widely expected that Leeds East MP George Mudie will stand down, which means that this is a winnable Labour seat that is going to be up for grabs.
Leeds North West & Nidderdale
The Guardian data predicts a tiny Conservative majority and the vast majority of this new constituency is the old Leeds North East seat with just 12% of it from wards outside Leeds. Does this mean that Labour’s Fabian Hamilton could win it with the benefit of incumbency? I’d be doubtful as there are some very strong Conservative council wards in there. But, against that you’ve got to factor in the potential unpopularity of the Conservatives as the coalition cuts begin to bite.
Leeds South & Outwood
A predicted Labour seat with an almost 50/50 split between the old Leeds Central and Morley & Outwood. In theory you’d think it should be Ed Balls as he has that extra 6%. However, that doesn’t take into account the fact that Leeds Central has disappeared entirely and that there isn’t another logical home for Hilary Benn.
Leeds South West & Morley
Another predicted seat for Leeds. The biggest single part are the two Morley wards from Morley & Outwood, but 57% of the constituency still comes from elsewhere – 16% from outside Leeds. It would make sense for Ed Balls to stay here as that then provides a seat for Hilary Benn.
Leeds West & Pudsey
According to The Guardian data another Labour seat. The obvious contender is Rachel Reeves whose current Leeds West seat makes up 42% of the new constituency, the 44% from Pudsey currently being represented by Conservative Stuart Andrew.
According to this analysis it means that all of the existing Labour MPs (who might want to stand again) have winnable seats and there are four Leeds seats ‘available’ for new candidates to be selected.
Leeds North East and Leeds South East are both theoretically good Labour seats with no existing contenders for either.
Guiseley & Yeadon and Leeds North West & Nidderdale although theoretically Conservative seats are both winnable for Labour, largely on the strength of the large but weak Liberal Democrat vote.
New Parliamentary boundaries in Leeds
The proposed new Parliamentary boundaries are published tomorrow, but the report has already been leaked (Guido was the fastest to publish it). In Leeds the changes are dramatic with most constituencies looking entirely new.
Leeds North: consisting of Chapel Allerton from the old Leeds North East; Headingley and Weetwood from the old Leeds North West;, Hyde Park and Woodhouse from Leeds Central; and Kirkstall from Leeds West. Looks like a straight fight between Labour and the Lib Dems. The Lib Dem contender is almost certain to be Greg Mulholland while the the Labour contender is most likely to be somebody new. It’s a winnable Labour seat and the most likely Labour contender could be Fabian Hamilton, even though it only contains one ward from Leeds North East, as it is probably more winnable than Leeds North West and Nidderdale.
Leeds North East: contains none of the old Leeds North East, but instead is made up mainly of the old Leeds East wards of Crossgates and Whinmoor, Gipton and Harehills, Killingbeck and Seacroft; with the addition of Harewood and Wetherby from the old Elmet and Rothwell constituency. This is a harder one to call because of disproportionate turnouts – the strong Conservative wards of Harewood and Wetherby both have really high voter turnout, while the Labour wards have historically low turnouts. a straight fight between Labour and the Tories. The obvious contender for Labour is George Mudie, except he’s likely to stand down so we have a winnable marginal Labour seat up for grabs. The Conservative is likely to be Alex Shelbrooke the current MP for Elmet and Rothwell.
Leeds North West and Nidderdale: is only partially a Leeds seat as it contains a great chunk of Harrogate. The Leeds wards are Adel and Wharfdale from the old Leeds North West; the remainder are from the old Leeds North East and are Alwoodley, Moortown and Roundhay. This could be a three way fight, which with the current performance of the Lib Dems effectively means it will be Labour versus a Tory, but with a distinct Conservative lead.
Leeds South and Outwood: is made up of both Leeds and Wakefield wards. From Leeds Central there is Middleton Park along with City and Hunslet; from Morley and Outwood there is Ardsley and Robin Hood in Leeds with Stanley and Outwood East and Wrenthorpe and Outwood from West from Wakefield. Looks like a safe Labour seat, but for who? It could be either Hilary Benn from Leeds Central (a constituency that disappears entirely) or Ed Balls from Morley and Outwood. My money is on Hilary Benn.
Leeds South West and Morley: is mainly Leeds, but also gains Batley East from Batley and Spen constituency. It also has Beeston and Holbeck from Leeds Central; Farnley and Wortley from Leeds West; as well as Morley North and Morley South from Morley and Outwood. Should be another safe Labour seat. The logical approach would surely be Ed Balls here.
Leeds South East: consists of Burmantofts and Richmond Hill from Leeds Central; Garforth and Swillington, Kippax and Methley and Rothwell from Elmet and Rothwell; and Temple Newsam from Leeds East. This should be a safe Labour seat, but without an obvious candidate as George Mudie from Leeds East is unlikely to stand and it only has one ward from Hilary Benn’s Leeds Central. The three Elmet and Rothwell wards are currently represented by Conservative Alex Shelbrooke, but he’s far more likely to want to follow the Wetherby and Harewood bits of his constituency as he’d have zero chance in Leeds South East.
Leeds West and Pudsey: contains Armley, and Bramley and Stanningley from Leeds West; Calverley and Farsley, and Pudsey from the old Pudsey constituency; and Eccleshill from Bradford East. Should be another good Labour seat and the obvious contender is probably Rachel Reeves.
Guiseley and Yeadon: is a mix of Bradford and Leeds wards. From the old Pudsey constituency there is Guiseley and Rawdon, and Horsforth; from Leeds North West there is Otley and Yeadon; from Bradford West there is Baildon, and Idle and Thackley. This is likely to be a Conservative seat.
Based on my initial thinking this would leave the Leeds MPs standing in the following new seats:
Hilary Benn: Leeds South and Outwood
Ed Balls: Leeds South West and Morley
Rachel Reeves: Leeds West and Pudsey
Fabian Hamilton: Leeds North
George Mudie: Leeds North East, but is more likely to stand down
That means there could be two very winnable Labour seats up for grabs in Leeds and one potentially winnable seat. Leeds South East which has to be totally open as it doesn’t have a sitting or even recently defeated Labour MP in any of its wards. And Leeds North East where the sitting MP is almost certain not to stand again.
My Shadow Cabinet votes
The jockeying for position for the Shadow Cabinet elections has already started and LabourList has published its first list of the predicted Labour Shadow Cabinet contenders. In theory there are 19 positions of for grabs, in reality it’s not so straightforward as we’ve got the losing four leadership candidates who can all (even Diane?) be expected to get positions. This leaves 15 positions in real contention of which five will have to go to women (still assuming that all four leadership contenders get a place).
My 15 is not just those on LabourList, but those that I would like to see in cabinet (but excluding those who have explicitly ruled themselves out e.g. Tom Watson). My Shadow Cabinet votes (in order of preference) would therefore be:
- Yvette Cooper
- Alan Johnson
- Hilary Benn
- Gerry Sutcliffe
- Ivan Lewis
- Liam Byrne
- Rosie Winterton
- Caroline Flint
- Tom Harris
- Sadiq Kahn
- Tessa Jowell
- Ben Bradshaw
- Siobhan McDonagh
- Douglas Alexander
- Chris Bryant

