Opinions from a loyal Labour Party member
I warn you not to be ordinary…
Nov 29th
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
The Tory Liberal Democrat government’s brutal attack on public sector workers is an attack on us all. If we allow the Tories and Liberal Democrats to attack the public sector unopposed then Neil Kinnock’s vision of the future under Thatcher will become true under Cameron and Clegg.
My apocalyptic prediction on February 28, 2010 is becoming the horrifying reality.
If David Cameron is elected as prime minister this year, I warn you.
I warn you that you will have pain–when healing and relief depend upon payment.
I warn you that you will have ignorance–when talents are untended and wits are wasted, when learning is a privilege and not a right.
I warn you that you will have poverty–when pensions slip and benefits are whittled away by a government that won’t pay in an economy that can’t pay.
I warn you that you will be cold–when fuel charges are used as a tax system that the rich don’t notice and the poor can’t afford.
I warn you that you must not expect work–when many cannot spend, more will not be able to earn. When they don’t earn, they don’t spend. When they don’t spend, work dies.
I warn you not to go into the streets alone after dark or into the streets in large crowds of protest in the light.
I warn you that you will be quiet–when the curfew of fear and the gibbet of unemployment make you obedient.
I warn you that you will have defence of a sort–with a risk and at a price that passes all understanding.
I warn you that you will be home-bound–when fares and transport bills kill leisure and lock you up.
I warn you that you will borrow less–when credit, loans, mortgages and easy payments are refused to people on your melting income.
If David Cameron wins this year –
- I warn you not to be ordinary
- I warn you not to be young
- I warn you not to fall ill
- I warn you not to get old.
Conference performances and shadow cabinet reshuffle
Sep 28th
The newspapers and political blogs are already full of rumours and recommendations about a possible shadow cabinet reshuffle now that Ed Miliband has a free hand and isn’t bound by the ridiculous shadow cabinet elections. This is my contribution to the speculation, red stays in, blue is out as they doing more to help the Tories than us:
Leader of the Labour Party | Ed Miliband
Yes, I’d keep him, even though it was a truly dire speech.
Deputy Leader and Shadow Secretary of State for International Development | Harriet Harman
We need Harriet because she’s the only one with experience of being in the shadow cabinet before 1997, but she’s never one that impressed me – last on my list for the deputy leadership elections.
Shadow Chancellor | Ed Balls
Love him, or loath him you can’t deny that Ed is doing a cracking job, let’s leave him be.
Shadow Foreign Secretary | Douglas Alexander
He used to be one of Labour’s rising stars. Dumping him, would open up one of the four senior posts for someone who actually has talent.
Shadow Chief Whip | Rosie Winterton
Doing a good job, so let’s keep her in post.
Shadow Home Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities | Yvette Cooper MP
She’s already in one of the four most senior posts, so the only place she could go is to replace Ed (M that is, not the hubby). Ed had better up his game, because she has.
Shadow Chief Secretary | Angela Eagle
So she’s doing one of the four most important jobs. You’d never know. Bye Angela.
Shadow Secretary of State for Business, Innovation & Skills | John Denham
Sorry John, this is a vital post as growing the economy is what will get us out of the mess, but I’m not hearing anything worthwhile from you.
Cabinet Office and Minister for the Olympics | Tessa Jowell
Sorry Tessa, heard you at the Progress rally and you used all the right words about a need for a new politics and trust. Problem is it didn’t sound like you actually understood them, it’s no good just trotting out buzz words.
Shadow Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government | Caroline Flint
Why is the speculation targeting Caroline? She’s doing a great job and is Labour’s best hope for helping us to come up with and sell some radical new ideas for local government – because we certainly need to dramatically shake up the status quo, but not always in the ways that the Tories want to.
Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media & Sport | Ivan Lewis
Hard one this. I like Ivan and think he’s doing a reasonable job, but his conference speech was dire and his idea for licensing journalists just bonkers. Sorry Ivan, you’re the only one I’d be sad to get rid of, but we need the space.
Shadow Leader of the House of Commons | Hilary Benn
Come on Ed, give the man a chance. He’s ace on radio interviews, so why don’t you deploy him more?
Shadow Secretary of State for Defence | Jim Murphy
Fairly neutral on Jim, but there are enough others that need to go so there is space for Jim to stay.
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs | Mary Creagh
Got off to a very slow start and could have been better on the whole forest sale issue, but has now well and truly got into her stride and is doing a great job,
Shadow Secretary of State for Education and Election Coordinator | Andy Burnham
Good performance all year and absolutely brilliant conference speech. Only possible reason for not promoting Andy is that he is so good at education which is vitally important. But there are others that could do that job, let’s get Andy into Shadow Foreign Secretary to give Hague a run for his money, which Douglas is failing spectacularly to do.
Disclaimer – not just saying that as Andy’s a friend, believe me it’s true!
Shadow Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice | Sadiq Khan
Another one I’m neutral about, so Sadiq can stay.
Shadow Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change | Meg Hillier
Meg, Meg this is important. The coalition is terrible. Shame your response is. Bye.
Shadow Secretary of State for Health | John Healey
This is a hard one. I’m usually impressed by John, but he’s been pretty weak so far on health. Let’s keep him in, but moved to something less important.
Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland | Shaun Woodward
Neutral again so Shaun can stay as he’s been good in the past and perhaps can be again.
Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland | Ann McKechin
Ann who? Bye.
Shadow Secretary of State for Transport | Maria Eagle
Transport is important and Maria’s not making the grade. Bye.
Shadow Secretary of State for Wales | Peter Hain
Peter impressed me in the deputy leadership elections so he can stay.
Shadow Secretary of State for Work & Pensions | Liam Byrne
Doing a good job, but let’s move him as I think that a new entrant would be good in this post.
Space for new blood
I’ve managed to find space for eight new faces, so these are some of my suggestions:
Rachel Reeves – great job as a junior DWP shadow, so let’s put her in the big seat and give Liam something else.
Chuka Umunna – heard him give a great speach at the FSB fringe. Since I want to get rid of John Denham, let’s give Chuka a promotion in the same shadow department he’s already in.
John Woodcock – a rising star that isn’t talked about enough. Let’s get him out of the junior shadow transport job and into the hot seat to replace Maria.
Gerry Sutcliffe – we don’t want too many very new faces and Gerry is a seasoned performer who’ll bring some gravitas to the shadow front bench, but will also seem new as he’s relatively unknown.
Michael Dugher – could make a good attack dog and we need one.
Gloria De Piero – hasn’t shone yet like all of the others I name, but has potential.
Don’t know enough about the rest of the possibilities, so can’t make any more suggestions.
New Leeds constituency predictions by 2010 local election results
Sep 13th
I’ve now got the data to do the new Leeds constituency predictions by votes in the 2010 local elections, which in Leeds happened at the same time as the general election. It’s also a flawed method as it doesn’t take into account factors such as people voting different ways in local and national elections, and it also doesn’t take into account where the available parties are different in the local and national elections. This is most notable in Morley where the Morley Borough Independents won both Morley wards in the local election, but didn’t stand in the general election.
Guardian predictions on percentage of general election vote
| Cons | Green | Labour | Lib Dem | WIN | Majority | |
| Guisley & Yeadon | 18,633 | 386 | 15,901 | 14,809 | CON | 2,732 |
| Leeds North | 12,637 | 675 | 16,630 | 15,923 | LAB | 707 |
| Leeds North East | 15,830 | 0 | 21,817 | 8,517 | LAB | 5,987 |
| Leeds North West & Nidderdale | 18,829 | 123 | 18,543 | 14,691 | CON | 286 |
| Leeds South & Outwood | 12,828 | 0 | 18,374 | 7,996 | LAB | 5,546 |
| Leeds South East | 18,145 | 0 | 19,865 | 8,985 | LAB | 1,720 |
| Leeds South West & Morley | 14,142 | 588 | 19,656 | 8,985 | LAB | 5,514 |
| Leeds West & Pudsey | 15,078 | 909 | 18,990 | 12,059 | LAB | 3,912 |
Predictions based on 2010 local election results by ward
| Cons | Others | Labour | Lib Dem | WIN | Majority | |
| Guisley & Yeadon | 17,402 | 3,486 | 11,464 | 21,868 | LIB DEM | 4,466 |
| Leeds North | 8,950 | 3,951 | 17,312 | 15,062 | LAB | 2,250 |
| Leeds North East | 18,072 | 4,214 | 19,252 | 9,611 | LAB | 1,180 |
| Leeds North West & Nidderdale | 24,593 | 3,120 | 14,508 | 15,062 | CON | 9,229 |
| Leeds South & Outwood | 11,560 | 6,720 | 18,881 | 7,220 | LAB | 7,321 |
| Leeds South East | 12,427 | 5,907 | 21,984 | 11,379 | LAB | 9,557 |
| Leeds South West & Morley | 9,674 | 16.484 | 17,529 | 6,693 | LAB | 7,855 |
| Leeds West & Pudsey | 12,666 | 6,069 | 19,220 | 11,336 | LAB | 6,554 |
As you can see both sets of predictions are significantly different in the size of majorities they predict. And if we looked at the 2011 local election results we’d see yet another set of results.
That said, it still leaves Labour with six of the eight seats, the main difference being in the size of the predicted majorities in the other two – and that the Liberal Democrats manage to win Guisley and Rawdon, which is doubtful.
Leeds constituency boundary changes–more analysis
Sep 13th
The Guardian data site has helpfully provided some data that enable you to make more ‘assumptions’ about the boundary changes.
Predictions based on the 2010 general election (i.e. I can’t see where it says how it has calculated them, but it looks like via crude percentages from each old seat rather than votes per ward in local elections). Once I have the data based on votes per ward I’ll try and post an update.
| Cons | Green | Labour | Lib Dem | WIN | Majority | |
| Guisley & Yeadon | 18,633 | 386 | 15,901 | 14,809 | CON | 2,732 |
| Leeds North | 12,637 | 675 | 16,630 | 15,923 | LAB | 707 |
| Leeds North East | 15,830 | 0 | 21,817 | 8,517 | LAB | 5,987 |
| Leeds North West & Nidderdale | 18,829 | 123 | 18,543 | 14,691 | CON | 286 |
| Leeds South & Outwood | 12,828 | 0 | 18,374 | 7,996 | LAB | 5,546 |
| Leeds South East | 18,145 | 0 | 19,865 | 8,985 | LAB | 1,720 |
| Leeds South West & Morley | 14,142 | 588 | 19,656 | 8,985 | LAB | 5,514 |
| Leeds West & Pudsey | 15,078 | 909 | 18,990 | 12,059 | LAB | 3,912 |
What’s interesting about this is that none of the majorities are huge and it show the Liberal Democrats have a significant vote in both of the Conservative seats. It only takes a small amount of those Liberal Democrat voters to switch to Labour (many switched from Labour in the first place) for these seats to be winnable for Labour.
The other interesting data is the one that shows what percentage of the old constituencies goes into the new ones.
Guisley & Yeadon
Theoretically a Tory seat so the lead contender is likely to be Stuart Andrew, the existing Conservative MP for Pudsey. Given the size of the Liberal Democrat vote and the current state of affairs it’s also a seat where a hard-working Labour candidate actually has a chance.
Leeds North
Theoretically a Labour seat, but the largest component is Leeds North West which at the moment has the Liberal Democrat Greg Mulholland. Then there is approximately 20% each from Leeds West, Leeds Central and Leeds North East. Given that Hilary Benn (Leeds Central) and Rachel Reeves (Leeds West) both have alternatives – and that the new constituency that takes most of the old Leeds North East electorate is likely to be Conservative – this looks like one for Fabian Hamilton.
Leeds North East
Theoretically a Labour seat with a healthy Labour majority. It’s widely expected that Leeds East MP George Mudie will stand down, which means that this is a winnable Labour seat that is going to be up for grabs.
Leeds North West & Nidderdale
The Guardian data predicts a tiny Conservative majority and the vast majority of this new constituency is the old Leeds North East seat with just 12% of it from wards outside Leeds. Does this mean that Labour’s Fabian Hamilton could win it with the benefit of incumbency? I’d be doubtful as there are some very strong Conservative council wards in there. But, against that you’ve got to factor in the potential unpopularity of the Conservatives as the coalition cuts begin to bite.
Leeds South & Outwood
A predicted Labour seat with an almost 50/50 split between the old Leeds Central and Morley & Outwood. In theory you’d think it should be Ed Balls as he has that extra 6%. However, that doesn’t take into account the fact that Leeds Central has disappeared entirely and that there isn’t another logical home for Hilary Benn.
Leeds South West & Morley
Another predicted seat for Leeds. The biggest single part are the two Morley wards from Morley & Outwood, but 57% of the constituency still comes from elsewhere – 16% from outside Leeds. It would make sense for Ed Balls to stay here as that then provides a seat for Hilary Benn.
Leeds West & Pudsey
According to The Guardian data another Labour seat. The obvious contender is Rachel Reeves whose current Leeds West seat makes up 42% of the new constituency, the 44% from Pudsey currently being represented by Conservative Stuart Andrew.
According to this analysis it means that all of the existing Labour MPs (who might want to stand again) have winnable seats and there are four Leeds seats ‘available’ for new candidates to be selected.
Leeds North East and Leeds South East are both theoretically good Labour seats with no existing contenders for either.
Guiseley & Yeadon and Leeds North West & Nidderdale although theoretically Conservative seats are both winnable for Labour, largely on the strength of the large but weak Liberal Democrat vote.
New Parliamentary boundaries in Leeds
Sep 12th
The proposed new Parliamentary boundaries are published tomorrow, but the report has already been leaked (Guido was the fastest to publish it). In Leeds the changes are dramatic with most constituencies looking entirely new.
Leeds North: consisting of Chapel Allerton from the old Leeds North East; Headingley and Weetwood from the old Leeds North West;, Hyde Park and Woodhouse from Leeds Central; and Kirkstall from Leeds West. Looks like a straight fight between Labour and the Lib Dems. The Lib Dem contender is almost certain to be Greg Mulholland while the the Labour contender is most likely to be somebody new. It’s a winnable Labour seat and the most likely Labour contender could be Fabian Hamilton, even though it only contains one ward from Leeds North East, as it is probably more winnable than Leeds North West and Nidderdale.
Leeds North East: contains none of the old Leeds North East, but instead is made up mainly of the old Leeds East wards of Crossgates and Whinmoor, Gipton and Harehills, Killingbeck and Seacroft; with the addition of Harewood and Wetherby from the old Elmet and Rothwell constituency. This is a harder one to call because of disproportionate turnouts – the strong Conservative wards of Harewood and Wetherby both have really high voter turnout, while the Labour wards have historically low turnouts. a straight fight between Labour and the Tories. The obvious contender for Labour is George Mudie, except he’s likely to stand down so we have a winnable marginal Labour seat up for grabs. The Conservative is likely to be Alex Shelbrooke the current MP for Elmet and Rothwell.
Leeds North West and Nidderdale: is only partially a Leeds seat as it contains a great chunk of Harrogate. The Leeds wards are Adel and Wharfdale from the old Leeds North West; the remainder are from the old Leeds North East and are Alwoodley, Moortown and Roundhay. This could be a three way fight, which with the current performance of the Lib Dems effectively means it will be Labour versus a Tory, but with a distinct Conservative lead.
Leeds South and Outwood: is made up of both Leeds and Wakefield wards. From Leeds Central there is Middleton Park along with City and Hunslet; from Morley and Outwood there is Ardsley and Robin Hood in Leeds with Stanley and Outwood East and Wrenthorpe and Outwood from West from Wakefield. Looks like a safe Labour seat, but for who? It could be either Hilary Benn from Leeds Central (a constituency that disappears entirely) or Ed Balls from Morley and Outwood. My money is on Hilary Benn.
Leeds South West and Morley: is mainly Leeds, but also gains Batley East from Batley and Spen constituency. It also has Beeston and Holbeck from Leeds Central; Farnley and Wortley from Leeds West; as well as Morley North and Morley South from Morley and Outwood. Should be another safe Labour seat. The logical approach would surely be Ed Balls here.
Leeds South East: consists of Burmantofts and Richmond Hill from Leeds Central; Garforth and Swillington, Kippax and Methley and Rothwell from Elmet and Rothwell; and Temple Newsam from Leeds East. This should be a safe Labour seat, but without an obvious candidate as George Mudie from Leeds East is unlikely to stand and it only has one ward from Hilary Benn’s Leeds Central. The three Elmet and Rothwell wards are currently represented by Conservative Alex Shelbrooke, but he’s far more likely to want to follow the Wetherby and Harewood bits of his constituency as he’d have zero chance in Leeds South East.
Leeds West and Pudsey: contains Armley, and Bramley and Stanningley from Leeds West; Calverley and Farsley, and Pudsey from the old Pudsey constituency; and Eccleshill from Bradford East. Should be another good Labour seat and the obvious contender is probably Rachel Reeves.
Guiseley and Yeadon: is a mix of Bradford and Leeds wards. From the old Pudsey constituency there is Guiseley and Rawdon, and Horsforth; from Leeds North West there is Otley and Yeadon; from Bradford West there is Baildon, and Idle and Thackley. This is likely to be a Conservative seat.
Based on my initial thinking this would leave the Leeds MPs standing in the following new seats:
Hilary Benn: Leeds South and Outwood
Ed Balls: Leeds South West and Morley
Rachel Reeves: Leeds West and Pudsey
Fabian Hamilton: Leeds North
George Mudie: Leeds North East, but is more likely to stand down
That means there could be two very winnable Labour seats up for grabs in Leeds and one potentially winnable seat. Leeds South East which has to be totally open as it doesn’t have a sitting or even recently defeated Labour MP in any of its wards. And Leeds North East where the sitting MP is almost certain not to stand again.
How do you think Ed Miliband is doing?
Mar 1st
Today I met a Labour Party friend who we’re doing a bit of consultancy work with. Every time we have a business meeting we also have a quick chat as he asks me how do you think Ed’s doing? He was a supporter of Ed Miliband in the Labour leadership election, while I actually worked for Andy Burnham.
Personally I think Ed’s still struggling to get traction. He’s mainly saying and doing the right things, but he’s just not getting the cut through that Labour needs. The main message that’s failing to hit home is one that starts to demonstrate Labour’s economic competence. Ed has already told us in explicit terms that he won’t oppose every cut. But that message is failing miserably to get through. The message that is coming through far stronger is the other Ed saying that we shouldn’t cut so deep, so fast. He’s right of course, but that needs to be balanced with a recognition that some cuts are needed.
Even if Ed is succeeding in keeping his Shadow Cabinet in check, which I’m not sure he is, the message on the ground from constituency MPs is to oppose every cut. All over the country you get MPs and councillors jumping onto the anti-cuts band wagon supporting every local campaign group opposing every single cut.
Frankly it’s not credible and makes Labour look incredibly out of touch with what real people are saying.
Yorkshire and Humber MPs dominate Labour’s new shadow cabinet
Oct 9th
Not only does Labour Party’s new leader represent a Yorkshire constituency, but nine of the new shadow cabinet do as well. Doncaster is particularly well represented with all three of its MPs in the shadow cabinet.
What’s most impressive to me is how well Ed Miliband has deployed the team he’s been handed by the PLP election.
Caroline Flint is ideal for communities and local government where some radical thinking is certainly required. It requires someone who isn’t afraid to court unpopularity amongst the more recalcitrant members of the Labour Party who simply want to maintain the status quo.
Alan Johnson will be the ideal foil to George Osbourne. As rich boy George attacks the poor, weak and vulnerable, Alan will be the perfect voice of reason on the side of people like us, while George backs the rich.
Just like his dad, Hilary Benn is a great speaker and is well suited to his new role.
Yvette Cooper well deserves one of the great offices of state and her new role is a great platform for her.
Mary Creagh is the least well-known of the new shadow cabinet and has never even held ministerial office. However, as a backbench MP she has an excellent track record of campaigning including on junk food. That’s why I think her new role is the right one.
I know all bar one, and have worked closely with many, of the new team. The only one of the ten I don’t know is John Healey.
The full list of Labour Party shadow cabinet in Yorkshire and Humber is:
Don Valley: Caroline Flint MP; Shadow Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government: www.carolineflint.co.uk
Doncaster Central: Rosie Winterton MP; Chief Whip: www.rosiewinterton.co.uk
Doncaster North: Ed Miliband MP; Leader of the Opposition: www.edmiliband.org.uk
Hemsworth: Jon Trickett MP; Shadow Minister of State for the Cabinet Office: www.jontrickett.org.uk
(Jon isn’t a full member, but will attend shadow cabinet meetings)
Kingston-upon-Hull West & Hessle: Alan Johnson MP; Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer: www.alanjohnson.org
Leeds Central: Hilary Benn MP; Shadow Leader of the House of Commons: www.hilarybenn.org
Morley & Outwood: Ed Balls MP; Shadow Secretary of State for Home Affairs: www.edballs.com
Normanton, Pontefract & Castleford: Yvette Cooper MP; Shadow Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Shadow Minister for Women and Equalities: www.yvettecooper.com
Wakefield: Mary Creagh MP; Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: www.marycreagh.co.uk
Wentworth and Dearne: John Healey MP; Shadow Secretary of State for Health: www.johnhealeymp.co.uk
Labour leadership – the two nightmare scenarios
Sep 22nd
Now that it’s all done bar the counting I want to share my fear about what is about to happen to the Labour Party. My big fear is that whichever Miliband brother wins, it will be because of a seriously flawed electoral process. This leadership contest has for me shown without a shadow of a doubt that Labour’s rules for the contest need to be fundamentally revised.
The two nightmare scenarios for me are:
1) David Miliband wins, but only because of the strength of his MP support and loses the union section, and probably even the membership section.
2) Ed Miliband wins because he overwhelmingly carries the union and membership section, but loses the MP one.
Either scenario means that we’ve got a leader who will from day one lack some credibility and find it far harder to to unify the party and take it in a brave new direction.
My personal view is that MPs have far too great a say in the leadership election. It is absolutely right that MPs have a big say as a leader must command the respect of his/her colleagues. But currently MPs have two big says – they control the shortlist and each individual vote carries massive individual weight in the actual election.
One of the two has to be curtailed. Personally, I’m happy for MPs to control the short listing and the current threshold is about right. However, nominations should be anonymous. MPs mustn’t feel threatened in to supporting a particular candidate because of fears over their future career prospects. That type of bullying fear-filled electoral practice is for the 20th century, not the 21st.
That means however that MPs should be stripped of most of their voting power, perhaps reducing them to just 10% of the electoral college. They’ve had their say and kept anyone totally unsuitable off the shortlist, so it’s up to grassroots members to have the final say.
My Shadow Cabinet votes
Sep 15th
The jockeying for position for the Shadow Cabinet elections has already started and LabourList has published its first list of the predicted Labour Shadow Cabinet contenders. In theory there are 19 positions of for grabs, in reality it’s not so straightforward as we’ve got the losing four leadership candidates who can all (even Diane?) be expected to get positions. This leaves 15 positions in real contention of which five will have to go to women (still assuming that all four leadership contenders get a place).
My 15 is not just those on LabourList, but those that I would like to see in cabinet (but excluding those who have explicitly ruled themselves out e.g. Tom Watson). My Shadow Cabinet votes (in order of preference) would therefore be:
- Yvette Cooper
- Alan Johnson
- Hilary Benn
- Gerry Sutcliffe
- Ivan Lewis
- Liam Byrne
- Rosie Winterton
- Caroline Flint
- Tom Harris
- Sadiq Kahn
- Tessa Jowell
- Ben Bradshaw
- Siobhan McDonagh
- Douglas Alexander
- Chris Bryant

